
CBAM Certificate Cost Formula and Pricing Rules
Key Takeaways
- This guide covers guide reporting requirements based on IR (EU) 2025/2621 and EU Regulation 2023/956
- All emission factors and CN codes referenced are verified against the latest EU implementing regulations
- Practical steps and common mistakes are drawn from hands-on implementation experience with the CbamTrack platform
From the team behind CbamTrack
We built this guide based on hands-on experience implementing CBAM compliance for SME importers. The calculations and workflows described here power our own platform — this is not theory, it's what we ship.
The CBAM definitive phase started on January 1, 2026, which means certificate obligations are no longer theoretical. But "how much will this actually cost me" turns out to be a harder question than most guides make it look — the answer depends on four separate inputs, one of which (the phase-in factor) most importers haven't fully internalized yet, and the payment calendar itself changed under the EU's October 2025 simplification package.
"Certificate prices reflect the quarterly average of EU ETS auction clearing prices for the 2026 compliance year. From 2027 onward, prices are based on weekly averages." — European Commission, DG TAXUD
This is the full calculation, sector by sector, with worked examples. For the current ETS price, see the live price banner above.
All data in this article is sourced from EU Regulation 2023/956, IR (EU) 2025/2548, IR (EU) 2025/2621, and the European Commission's official CBAM certificate price publication (April 7, 2026). Last verified: July 2026.
The four inputs
1. Embedded emissions (tCO2e) Either verified actual data from your supplier, or EU default values if you don't have it. Default values carry an extra markup on top: 10% in 2026, rising toward 30% by 2028 for most goods. Defaults aren't the "easy path" — they're the expensive path, deliberately. (Source: IR (EU) 2025/2621, default value methodology)
2. The CBAM factor (free allocation adjustment) This is the percentage by which free allocation offsets your embedded emissions liability. It phases in on the inverse curve of free EU ETS allowances:
| Year | CBAM factor (free allocation offset) | Net liable share |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 97.5% | 2.5% |
| 2027 | 95% | 5% |
| 2028 | 90% | 10% |
| 2029 | 77.5% | 22.5% |
| 2030 | 51.5% | 48.5% |
| 2031 | 39% | 61% |
| 2032 | 26.5% | 73.5% |
| 2033 | 14% | 86% |
| 2034 | 0% | 100% |
Source: Regulation (EU) 2023/956, Annex VIII — CBAM factor phase-out schedule
In 2026, 97.5% of your embedded emissions are offset by the free allocation adjustment. Only the remaining 2.5% generates a certificate obligation. By 2034, the free allocation offset drops to 0% and the full embedded emissions become liable.
Your 2026 bill is a tiny fraction of what the same import volume will cost by 2030. Budget planning should use the 2030 number, not the 2026 one.
3. Carbon price paid at origin If your supplier has paid a verifiable carbon price in the country of production, that amount can be deducted from your CBAM obligation — with documentation.
4. The certificate price For the 2026 compliance year, certificate prices are a quarterly average of EU ETS auction clearing prices. From 2027 onward, it reverts to a weekly average. As of late June 2026, EU ETS allowances were trading around €80/tonne. The first official certificate price (Q1 2026) was published on April 7, 2026 at €75.36/tCO₂. (Source: European Commission, DG TAXUD — Price of CBAM certificates page)
The calendar changed too
- Certificate sales start February 1, 2027, not January 2026 — you'll buy certificates in 2027 to cover 2026 imports.
- Annual declaration deadline: September 30 (moved from May 31) of the following year.
- Quarterly holding requirement: 50% of year-to-date embedded emissions (down from 80%).
If a source you're reading still describes the original 2023 timeline, it's out of date.
Formula
Step 1: Emissions subject to CBAM = Embedded emissions − (Benchmark x CBAM factor x Mass)
Step 2: Certificate obligation (tCO2e) = max(0, Emissions subject to CBAM)
Step 3: Certificate cost (EUR) = Certificate obligation x Certificate price
Where embedded emissions uses default-value markup if you don't have verified supplier data.
CBAM factor in 2026 is 97.5% — meaning 97.5% of your embedded emissions are offset by the free allocation adjustment. Only the remaining 2.5% generates a certificate obligation. By 2034, the factor reaches 0% and the full embedded emissions are liable.
Steel: worked example
Steel (CN 7206–7229, 7301–7306) has three common production routes, each with very different emissions intensity:
| Route | Typical benchmark (tCO2e/tonne) |
|---|---|
| BF-BOF (blast furnace) | 1.370 |
| DRI-EAF (direct reduced iron) | 0.481 |
| Scrap-EAF (recycled) | 0.072 |
Source: IR (EU) 2025/2621, Annex I — Steel sector benchmarks
Note: CBAM treats indirect emissions differently depending on the sector. Under Regulation 2023/956 Article 7(1), Annex II sectors — iron/steel, aluminium, electricity, and hydrogen — are indirect-exempt for chargeable purposes. This means only direct emissions count toward your certificate obligation for these sectors. Cement and fertilisers, which are NOT in Annex II, include indirect emissions in their chargeable calculation.
Example: 1,000 tonnes of BF-BOF steel, imported in 2026
| Calculation Step | Value |
|---|---|
| Verified embedded emissions | 1,900 tCO₂e |
| Free allocation offset | 1,335.75 tCO₂e |
| Emissions subject to CBAM | 564.25 tCO₂e |
| Certificate price | ~€80/tonne |
| 2026 certificate cost | ~€45,140 |
Run the same shipment at the 2030 CBAM factor (51.5%) and an illustrative €90/tonne price: free allocation becomes 1.370 x 51.5% x 1,000 = 705.55 tCO2e, leaving 1,194.45 tCO2e liable — ≈ €107,500.
Aluminium: worked example
Aluminium (CN 7601–7616) is electricity-intensive, but under Regulation 2023/956 Article 7(1), it's an Annex II sector — meaning only direct emissions are chargeable for CBAM purposes. Indirect emissions (from electricity) must still be reported for transparency, but they do not affect your certificate obligation.
This is a common source of confusion: the same regulation that charges indirect emissions for cement and fertilisers excludes them for aluminium. The carbon intensity of the electricity grid matters for reporting, but not for your CBAM bill.
- Typical unwrought aluminium benchmark: 1.423 tCO2e/tonne
- Typical direct emissions: ~1.5 tCO2e/tonne (anode consumption, process emissions)
- Indirect emissions vary by grid (0.1–12 tCO2e/tonne) — reported but NOT chargeable
Example: 500 tonnes of unwrought aluminium, imported in 2026, coal-heavy grid
- Direct emissions: 500 × 1.5 = 750 tCO2e
- Indirect emissions: 500 × 8.0 = 4,000 tCO2e (reported, not chargeable)
- Chargeable embedded emissions: 750 tCO2e (direct only — Annex II)
- Free allocation offset: 1.423 × 97.5% × 500 = 693.98 tCO2e
- Emissions subject to CBAM: 750 − 693.98 = 56.02 tCO2e
- Certificate price: ~€80/tonne
2026 cost: 56.02 × €80 ≈ €4,482 — lower than you might expect, because indirect emissions (which dominate aluminium's total footprint) are excluded from the chargeable calculation under Annex II.
Cement: worked example
Cement (CN 2523, plus kaolin under 2507) is dominated by calcination emissions — a process emission from converting limestone to clinker, not a fuel-combustion emission, which means efficiency improvements at the plant only go so far in reducing it.
- Typical benchmark: 0.666 tCO2e/tonne
- Key variable: clinker-to-cement ratio — cement blended with more supplementary materials (fly ash, slag) has proportionally lower embedded emissions than pure clinker cement
Example: 2,000 tonnes of cement, imported in 2026
- Verified embedded emissions: 2,000 x 0.7 tCO2e/tonne = 1,400 tCO2e
- Free allocation offset: 0.666 x 97.5% x 2,000 = 1,298.70 tCO2e
- Emissions subject to CBAM: 1,400 − 1,298.70 = 101.30 tCO2e
- Certificate price: ~€80/tonne
2026 cost: 101.30 x €80 ≈ €8,104
Fertilizer: worked example
Fertilizer (CN 2808, 2814, 2834, 3102, 3105) is the most heterogeneous category — benchmark values range from 0.173 to 1.522 tCO2e/tonne depending on the specific CN code, because ammonia (produced from natural gas) is a precursor for most nitrogen fertilizers, and the emissions intensity depends heavily on the production pathway and the exporting country's natural gas pricing and access.
Because the range is so wide, there's no single representative example worth generalizing — the CN code and production pathway matter more here than in any other CBAM sector. This is the category where checking your specific product's benchmark, rather than assuming a sector average, matters most.
Common mistakes
Assuming this year's cost reflects reality. The real financial exposure shows up in 2029–2030, when the free allocation offset drops from 77.5% to 51.5% in a single year.
Defaulting to default values because verified data feels like extra work. The markup exists to discourage exactly this. Getting real emissions data from your supplier now, while the numbers are still small, is far cheaper than switching after 2028.
Not tracking the origin carbon price deduction. If your supplier operates in a country with any form of carbon pricing, that's real money left on the table without documentation.
Treating indirect emissions rules as uniform across sectors. Annex II sectors (steel, aluminium, electricity, hydrogen) are indirect-exempt for chargeable purposes, while cement and fertilisers include indirect emissions. Assuming one rule applies to all sectors produces the wrong number.
Getting verified data from suppliers who've never heard of CBAM
For steel, aluminium, and cement, verified data usually needs to come from the producer's own process records — furnace type, fuel mix, and for aluminium, the specific electricity contract or grid connection. If your supplier has never been asked for this before:
- Start with production route (which furnace/process type) — this alone often narrows the estimate more than any other single data point
- Ask for their most recent annual energy/fuel consumption figures, not projected or nameplate figures
- For aluminium specifically, ask about the electricity source directly — grid-supplied, dedicated hydro/renewable PPA, or on-site generation all produce very different numbers
- Document any carbon price they've already paid — this is the deduction most importers forget to claim
Try it yourself
Running these numbers by hand across a multi-product, multi-supplier import book gets unwieldy fast — that's exactly the problem CBAMTrack's calculator is built to solve, with the phase-in factor, current-year pricing rule, and sector benchmarks built in.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a CBAM certificate?
A CBAM certificate is a digital document that proves an EU importer has paid the carbon price for imported goods. The price is set quarterly based on EU ETS auction prices. In Q1 2026, the certificate price was €75.36 per tonne of CO₂.
How is CBAM cost calculated?
CBAM cost is calculated using the official formula from Regulation 2023/956, Article 7: Certificate obligation = Embedded emissions − (Benchmark × CBAM factor × Volume). Only emissions above the benchmark threshold are chargeable. In 2026, the CBAM factor is 97.5% (the free allocation offset), meaning you receive free allocation equal to 97.5% of the sector benchmark. See the worked example above for steel.
How much does a CBAM certificate cost?
As of Q1 2026, the CBAM certificate price is €75.36 per tonne of CO₂. Prices are updated quarterly based on EU ETS auction clearing prices.
What is the CBAM phase-in factor?
The CBAM factor determines the percentage of the sector benchmark that counts as free allocation. In 2026 it's 97.5% (you get 97.5% of the benchmark for free). By 2034 it reaches 0%, meaning no free allocation remains and all embedded emissions are chargeable. The factor declines as follows: 95% (2027), 90% (2028), 77.5% (2029), 51.5% (2030), 39% (2031), 26.5% (2032), 14% (2033), 0% (2034). (Source: Regulation 2023/956, Annex VIII)
Sources
- EU Regulation 2023/956 — CBAM main regulation
- IR (EU) 2025/2621 — Default emission values and methodology
- IR (EU) 2025/2548 — Transitional and definitive phase rules
- European Commission CBAM page
Last updated: July 2026 | Sources: EU Regulation 2023/956, IR (EU) 2025/2548, European Commission CBAM Certificate Price Publication
Important Financial Disclaimer
The financial figures, cost estimates, and compliance scenarios discussed in this article are for informational purposes only. Actual CBAM liability depends on your specific import profile, verified emission data, and regulatory interpretations. Consult a qualified CBAM advisor or customs professional before making compliance decisions.
This article was researched and written with AI assistance. Figures and regulatory references are cross-checked against official EU sources (EUR-Lex, European Commission CBAM page) and updated when the rules change.
R. Emrah Gökkaya
I built CbamTrack because I saw SME exporters struggling with spreadsheets and confusing regulations. Every article here reflects what I've learned implementing IR 2025/2621-compliant calculations, integrating live EU ETS pricing, and building the emission factor database that powers our platform.
View full author bio →Ready to simplify your CBAM compliance?
Subscribe today and generate your first CBAM report in minutes.